Nikon D40 6.1MP Digital SLR Camera Kit with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II Auto Focus-S DX Zoom-Nikkor Lens

Excellent photos, easy to use, comfortable to hold, and FAST! This is one great camera, especially for the price. For a little more than many mid to high-end point and shoots, this camera packs a lot of technology into it's small price tag. But for the beginning DSLR user, that technology works in the background so just set it to AUTO and fire away, and you've got the best pictures you have ever taken. You will wish you made the move from point and shoot to DSLR sooner! I did a lot of research before choosing the D40, and all the reviews seemed to point to this one as the best entry-level DSLR, and in the 7 months I have had this camera, I have not been disappointed. Thousands of pictures later, I echo many other positive reviews here - this is one of THE best electronics purchases I have ever made. So many people have asked about my camera after seeing my photos (quite a few have even asked if I am a professional photographer). Several have since bought their own D40s :) For me, one of the huge annoyances with a point and shoot is the time between shots - waiting and waiting for your camera to recharge the flash or write the data to the memory card. Not a problem with a DSLR. The D40 starts up quickly, is fast between shots, and allows you to take more photos without flash. In the beginning I used the "scene modes" and Auto, and Auto no Flash, but my interest in photography has grown since using this camera and I use the manal and semi-automatic modes now. This camera is great for BOTH casual and enthusiast users. Stick to AUTO and get great shots OR learn about photography techniques and delve into all of the camera's different settings for more difficult lighting situations, etc. Once you have your D40, if you find yourself getting interested in photography, you may want to collect some additional gear over time. Here is a list of some accesories I have acquired to use with my D40: LowePro Rezo 170 Camera Bag (Not ugly. Works great. Holds D40 plus camcorder or D40 plus flash, 2 lenses and room to spare.) Nikon SB-400 flash (Yes, you eventually want this. Small, lightweight, inexpensive. Saves your camera's battery power and recharges more quickly. Use it to bounce light off the ceiling for indoor photos. It looks so much better you will never use regular non-diffused front-on flash again. Get rechargeable AA batteries, I love the Sanyo Eneloops and I am slowly replacing all my AAA and AA batteries in the house with these). Nikkor 55-200mm VR zoom lens (Inexpensive, works great. Get the VR version, not non-VR version. Nikon sometimes does a $[...] [...] with this lens when you buy the camera and lens at the same time. That makes it super cheap). Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 lens (This is getting repetive, but this lens is cheap. Great value. Amazing low light, no flash pictures. I love natural light and this lens is my favorite for those situations where you don't have that much light available to you. One big drawback is that it is Manual focus on a D40, but over time you learn. Get the Nikon HR2 lens hood to go with it). Nikon ML-L3 wireless remote (Inexpensive, works well. Easy way to take family group shots for your Christmas cards). Sandisk Ultra II Sd Card (Have not had any problems with lost data. Transfer your images frequently to your computer and use your camera to reformat the card each time to minimize your chances of corrupt data or data errors). Sigma EX DG 52mm Multi-Coated UV Filter (No problems with this filter). One last thing, during my research I considered getting the Canon Rebel counterpart. To me the Nikon has several advantages - better menus (Canon's menu looks archaic and crude in comparison), better selection of affordable lenses, flash and other accesories, better ergonomics, better color rendition, auto ISO. Both camera companies are great and both cameras are capable of nice photos, but the D40 is much easier to use, and at the time I bought it, significantly cheaper I am completely happy I went with Nikon over Canon, and now that I have more experience in the DSLR world I look forward to upgrading to a bigger, more complex D300/700 eventually. But I know will still use my little D40 as well! One more last thing, if you are still unsure and want to know how to use this camera before buying, you can check the Nikon Digitutor online videos: [...]

The Nikon D40 6.1MP Digital SLR Camera Kit with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II Zoom lens was one of the best DSLR cameras for its time, and it’s easy to see why. The camera strikes a perfect balance between performance and simplicity, making it great for beginners and hobbyists alike. Its 6.1MP sensor delivers sharp, vibrant photos, and the auto-focus lens ensures clear shots with minimal effort. What really stands out is the ease of use. The menus and settings are intuitive, so adjusting shutter speed, aperture, and other controls feels straightforward without being overwhelming. The compact body makes it comfortable to carry around, perfect for everyday photography or travel. Overall, this camera delivers excellent image quality and user-friendly operation, making it a fantastic entry-level DSLR. Whether capturing landscapes, portraits, or casual snapshots, the D40 proves reliable and fun to use.

Wow. I've had this camera and lens for two days, and I love it already. It is my first DSLR, so I can't compare it to others. I got into photography eighteen years ago, with a Canon AE-1 Program, then bought a Nikon N6006 a couple years later. I used that N6006 all over the place and for all kinds of stuff (nature, wildlife, travel, portraits, art and jewelry, a wedding, etc.), some for personal fun and some professionally. It was great and I loved it. I sold that camera a couple weeks ago, along with the lenses. Now, I have the Nikon D40. Hallelujah, praise the lord, welcome to the new era in photography. I don't know where to start. - 730 high res, high quality shots one a single $22 2Gb SD card (not included) - Quick, quiet, and accurate auto-focus (the new Nikon AF-S silent wave technology, motor is in the lens, not the camera, and it is nearly silent. No "searching" back and forth like on my old N6006, either.) - Beautiful pictures! - Light weight, no more heavy camera and lens to hang from my neck. - 3D Color Matrix Metering seems to work great, I've tried some unusual lighting situations and I was very happy with the results. This is the high quality, inexpensive, easy to use, always ready camera of my dreams that never gets in my way. Now, I get to think about pictures, not equipment. That's exciting, and a little frightening, too. Great shooting, my friends! -------------------------- Update: One week later: Ok, so I did decide to think about equipment for awhile. As I said, you can use this camera in a number of fully automatic modes and get great results. Nonetheless, this camera is a deep and powerful photography machine. I spent the last week experimenting with the camera and reading a lot of literature, user group postings, etc. online. As probably with all dSLR's, you can go deep into image processing parameters like white-balance, noise reduction, tone, brightness, and contrast curves. I have taken the time to learn about these things (since I shot mostly B&W film, before, I never thought about much of this.) The white-balance control, alone, makes a huge difference in color quality (especially with indoor lighting). Also, unlike a digital point and shoot, the D40 can output RAW files (in the Nikon NEF format). It's a bit of work to learn how to work with these files and get the right tools (Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Lightroom being excellent choices), but it can be worth it. Using the RAW NEF files, you can get total, after the shot control over all the parameter curves I described above. You can even adjust exposure (by up to 1~2 f-stops) after the fact! Like I said, that's a bit more advanced of a topic, but know that you can do that, if you want to. Basiclly, if you're an old pro film shooter or if you're a digital point and shooter, this camera would be great. You can start in fully automatic mode and have fun taking pictures. Then, as you get the courage and desire, start learning about the different modes and features and gradually switching them from auto to manual. The D40 gives you that choice on an individual basis with every feature, so you choose how much the camera is in control and how much you are in control. Pair this camera with a good image processing software package (I'm using IrfanView as my viewer and Adobe Photoshop Elements for processing, great software on a slim budget), and go as deep you want to go.

I was initially going to buy a D40x, Rebel XTi, or D80 (10-mp cameras, all), but when I read about the myth of megapixels (check out [...]) I decided that the D40 was a real sleeper, a gem discounted about $200 at the time to the 10 mp cameras. This terrific little camera is perfect for the amateur photographer who wants a high-quality, light weight, compact DSLR that simply produces stunning images. I've had prints made up to 11x16 and they are just beautiful. The depth of color, sharpness of the terrific kit lens (which is visibly better than Canon's kit lens), the ease of use of the D40 -- unless you're a pro subjecting your camera to heavy use, there's really no reason to buy a camera like the D200, etc. (A friend of mine, a pro photographer, agreed when he saw that photos from my D40 and his from his D200 were literally indistinguishable on a recent photo-shooting trip.) I used the $200 I saved to buy the equally terrific Nikon 55-200mm VR zoom lens (I do a lot of sports photography of the kids). That's a much better investment than needless megapixels, especially since it basically eliminates the need to crop photos (it's the 35mm equivalent of an 80-300 zoom). Plus, the D40's flash sync speed is higher than the D40x which makes a real difference shooting indoor sports with flash. Whether you're just getting into digital photography or want to upgrade from a point-and-shoot, a beginner or been shooting for years, the D40 is a wonderful camera, hard to believe it's less than $500! Nikon did a great, great job of delivering a camera that is long on high-quality optics, useful controls, and stunning images while sparing you the useless marketing gimmicks like umpteen focusing points or "mine has more" megapixels. Kudos to them, they really got it perfect with this camera. Go get one, you'll love it!

Here is my Un-Biased review. I have owned the Nikon D40 for around eight months, so i know quite a bit about this camera. There are definitely a few things i like, and a few things i do not like about this camera. I will go over them briefly and discuss a few other things. Here are the Pros ( good things in simpler terms ) * You get the versatility of changing lenses to get different effects. you can get telephoto lenses, super-fast lenses, super-wide angle lenses, and so forth. You do not get this maneuverability with a point and shoot camera. This camera being a Digital SLR is an advantage in and of itself. * The cameras delivers very good image quality, better than any point and shoot camera on the market. The images are very sharp, and all of the details are vividly shown, when compared to more expensive Digital SLR cameras, it's obviously not the best of the best, but it is good nonetheless. * The size of the camera is perfect for what it is. It fits nicely in your hand, and feels nice in it. The camera is made of plastic, and does feel a little cheap, but that is expected. People may argue that some of your fingers are left out in the grip, but that is not an issue to me. Here are the cons * With the Nikon D40/D40x/D60 cameras you can not Autofocus AF lenses. AF lenses need Motors built into the camera to Autofocus, and the D40/d40x, and the D60 do not have that motor. They do, however, autofocus AF-S lenses, which have a motor on their own. So, if you love autofocus, and have a few AF lenses, you may want to consider the D80 at least. * The camera only has six megapixels. This isn't a major disadvantage but you definitely notice it when you crop the images, so if you love macro photography, you may want to consider a higher-end camera. To the average day-to-day photographer, this won't be an issue, but for serious Photography, it is definitely a factor. * The performance at higher ISO's is horrible. At ISO 3,200, the images are practically unusable. You even see tremendous noise at ISO 800. If you are considering the D60, it is even worse. For low-light photography this is not a good camera. * No dust-reduction facilities. Yup, you are going to get dust in there eventually, and you are going to have to clean it manually with the D40, which can be dangerous if you are inexperienced, and you may have to pay to have it done, so this is definitely a con in my eyes. If you are looking for an entry-level Digital SLR camera i suggest that you spend a little more on the D60, you are going to get a few more features ( a VR lens, Dust Reduction, etc ) which are very useful. I would even suggest the D90 if you really want your money's worth. This is a good camera, but when compared to others it's not the ' best '. If you are an average person who just wants Amazing pictures and don't worry about ' professional ' things, this camera would be fine.

The Nikon D40 is a great lightweight digital SLR. I previoiusly owned a D50, and the D40 is lighter and more compact. I have only shot a few hundred pictures so far, but the image quality is excellent. There are some reports that this camera tends to overexpose some high contrast shots. I have noticed this but I DON'T consider it a problem. The camera tends to expose for the darker parts of the image thus overexposing the lighter parts. This is not an issue unless your subject is in the lighter part of the shot. In most cases the subject in high contrast shots is in the shadows or is backlit so the subject actually ends up being well exposed. This turns out to be a real plus for a majority of people because they don't consider the placement of their subject relative to available light. It makes perfect sense that Nikon would have calibrated an amature DSLR meter this way. I have owned a lot of cameras and none of them have exposed shots perfectly 100% of the time. It is very easy to use exposure compensation on this camera to correct for any under or overexposure that you don't like. It's a digital camera so take as many shots as you want and just delete those you don't like. The D40 is very well built and the ergonomics are great. I can see all of the viewfinder with my glasses on (DSLRs require the user to look through the viewfinder versus the LCD screen to frame shots). The LCD screen is larger and brighter than the one on the old D50. The camera has enough features and flexibility for the beginner up to the professional photographer. Set it on auto and almost all shots will turn out great, or you can fiddle with all sorts of settings to your heart's desire. All of the negeatives or cons that I have seen for this camera in various reviews are related to things that few people will care anything about. Do some research and see for yourself. The most important thing to consider is image quality, and this camera does great in that area as do most digital SLRs. The D40's flash combined with Auto ISO is great. All flash shots I have taken have turned out very well exposed. I even took some flash shots of my house from across the street and they turned out perfectly exposed. Auto ISO set the ISO to 1600 on these shots, but the image quality was just fine. High ISO shots taken with DSLRs are almost as good as low ISO shots taken with point and shoot cameras. You cannot use megapixels to compare image quality between point and shoot cameras and DSLRs. My 6 megapixel D40 has far better image quality than my 7 megapixel Canon 850. Color and saturation are similar (the things that make people say "ooh, pretty picture"), but there is no comparison when it comes to noise and resolution (things that most people don't really notice or care about when looking at your pictures). You are wondering why I purchased a 6 megapixel DSLR when there are several on the market with higher pixel counts. There are three reasons: 1) price, 2) size and weight (very important if you carry the camera around all day or travel with it), and 3) the difference in image quality between 6 and 12 megapixels is miniscule and something that absolutely NO ONE would notice by looking at my pictures. If you take two identical shots with a D40 and a higher megapixel DSLR and blew them up to 8x10 or even 11x14 the average person wouldn't notice a difference, and more importantly...they wouldn't care. Color, saturation, and composition are much more important than small differences in resolution. These things are determined by the subject and the photographer, not megapixels. Some of my favorite digital pictures were taken with a 2 megapixel camera I owned several years ago. Save your money on megapixels and use it to take your significant other out for a nice dinner.

Unlike most people who have reviewed the Nikon D40 here, I came from a film based SLR background, rather than a digital point and shoot background. I still have, and treasure, some very nice and fully working gear built around the Olympus OM-4, which is a beautiful camera indeed. However, switching to the D40 is like moving from a bicycle to the space shuttle. The main advantage of a digital over a film based system is of course that you can see the picture immediately, and use it to adjust your parameters and actions. That's obvious, but if you are like me, and used to shooting film, you have to experience it to appreciate it. To me it was a tremendous eye-opener. The LCD display on the Nikon clearly shows composition, colors, and brightness, and you can zoom in to judge the sharpness of the image. Secondly, my two Nikon lenses almost always focus much better mechanically than I could manually. (On the other hand, if you do want or need to focus manually then Nikon offers little help beyond the picture in the viewfinder, whereas the Olympus has several effective focusing aids.) Failure to get good focus was the most frequent obstacle on my Olympus (and on a film based camera you find out about bad focus only long after the party is over). I used to shoot 35 mm slides because the usual commercial processing of paper prints produces average exposures. It's virtually impossible to get very dark or very light prints, unless you do the processing yourself, or pay for expensive lab work. With the D40 you can easily adjust the brightness of your pictures, as you take them. Another advantage of digital versus film is that you no longer need to worry about the expense of taking many pictures. You can easily shoot hundreds of pictures a day, and later pick those you want. The 18-55 mm kit lens that comes with the D40 is very good, and the system is very powerful with just that one lens. You may be happy for a long time with just the kit lens. I thought I would be, too. However, I lasted only 3 days before I ordered the Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED-IF AF-S VR DX Zoom-Nikkor Lens . That lens is a technological marvel. (It also costs more, and weighs more, than the camera.) Its tremendous zoom range makes it more versatile than any other lens I've ever even heard of. With its vibration reduction system it is feasible in good light to obtain sharp hand held pictures at maximum focal length. Of course you still want a tripod if you aim for perfection, and you do need one for long exposures. Both the kit lens and the 18-200mm super lens work very well as a macro lens, although I'm tantalized by reports that Nikon has some magical macro lenses in their lineup... The D40 has six mega pixels, (3008x2000) which is just fine for me. But if I was to start all over again I'd consider the D40x because of its greater resolution. On the other hand, the D40 does have the advantage of a higher flash sync speed (1/500 sec) than the D40x (1/200 sec). You can't use a wire release on the D40, but the inexpensive Nikon infrared remote works even better. I am very pleased with my Nikon system. It has revitalized my interest in photography and I look forward to exploring in greater depth its tremendous potential.

The sheer quantity of excellent reviews already posted here for the D40 would leave me nothing to add were it not for the possibility that my perspective might be useful to a certain subset of possible buyers. I purchased the D40 as a first DSLR, but not as a first SLR. As a former film SLR shooter getting back into SLR photography after a long absence, I was convinced by the many very positive reviews of the D40 that it would provide an excellent entry point. Ken Rockwell's rave reviews, in particular, had a strong influence on my decision, as did many of the favorable reviews posted here. In retrospect, for somebody in my position, I think that perhaps some of the D40's positives have been slightly overstated, and some of the negatives slightly understated. I would suggest that any prospective purchasers who feel they might aspire to any level of seriousness in their photography should give careful consideration to whether the D40 will be truly satisfactory to them beyond the short term. In my case I owned the D40 for about a month before deciding that the D90 would have been a better choice. I made the swap and find myself much better off for it. Things to consider: - Every review points out that the D40 can only autofocus using Nikon's latest (and most expensive) AF-S lenses. I optimistically underestimated the degree to which this would quickly become a handicap for me. Yes, these are Nikon's best lenses, but the reality is that in practice you will be able to do much more, much sooner, at much lower expense, if you are willing and able to use older "D" and "G" type AF lenses along with one or two of the newer AF-S lenses. As one example, perhaps the second or third lens most semi-serious shooters would want to buy for a DSLR is something along the lines of a 50mm f/1.8 prime. Cheap and excellent, Nikon's 50/1.8 will immediately give you creative options that don't exist in any AF-S lens, at any price. Other excellent lenses, like the 85mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8, 80-200mm f/2.8 zooms, 28-200mm "G" zoom, and various third-party and wide-angle options, either don't exist yet in AF-S form, or cost so much more to buy that a casual hobbyist like myself would have a very hard time justifying the expense. - High ISO (low light) performance. One of the great advantages of digital over film is the improvement in light capture that has come along with it. Low light, hand-held photography can be done now that was really completely impossible just a couple of decades ago. The D40 did not really allow me to experience this benefit as fully as I'd expected. I found an ISO setting of 800 on the D40 to be the maximum "good quality" setting, and noticeably less clean than the "base" ISO of 200. My informal impression is that the D90 is between one and two stops better. Combine that with the D90's ability to use faster lenses at lower cost than the D40, and the practical reality is that I can shoot equivalent quality photos in one-quarter to one-eighth the light with the D90 than with the D40. That is a tremendous advantage and much more than I had anticipated prior to owning the two cameras. - Availability of D-Lighting on D90-and-up Nikons. In my admittedly short experience D-Lighting is a feature of such tremendous value that by itself it might be enough to justify the extra expense of the D90. D-Lighting is able to control the contrast between light and dark areas in a scene, which has always been one of the primary difficulties facing any photographer. This feature might be of even more use to a less serious photographer than to a serious one since it will invisibly improve almost any casual picture made under sunlit conditions. On the D90, under harsh sunlight, I set D-Lighting to "Extra-High" and get very useable photos that would be throw-aways with the D40. In most other conditions I leave it turned on but set to "Auto." - The lack of a second (front) control dial. Another surprise for me. One dial, as the D40 has, allows you to quickly set one parameter at a time, such as shutter speed or white balance. Two dials allow you to set two separate, usually related, parameters at once. I didn't realize how great an impact this would have on the camera's overall usability. For example, in setting white balance the rear wheel chooses the white balance preset (auto, sunny, cloudy, etc) while the front trims it (tweaks the basic setting to slightly warmer or cooler, six steps each way). Or, during image review the front wheel changes to the previous or next image, while the front wheel changes the display (one click to the right for an rgb-histogram, for example, then one click back to the left to return to the full-sized image). In almost every setting, display and shooting mode the second wheel adds significant flexibility and speed to the camera's handling. - 6mp sensor. It is true, without a doubt, that excellent photos of almost any kind can be made with a 6mp sensor. I am happy with 6mp for 90% of my photograhy. However, I still found the jump to 12mp beneficial. One thing to keep in mind is that the flaws inherent in every part of the image capture and reproduction process add to one another, each only subtly, but the additive effect of cumulative imperfections makes all the difference in the quality of the eventual reproduced image. Although it's impossible to quantify, going from a 6mp to a 12mp sensor might be the equivalent of going from a good to an excellent lens, while at the same time raising the limits of what the excellent lens can produce. It is also much cheaper than the difference in cost between, say, a full complement of good, "consumer" lenses and first-rate "pro" lenses. The bottom line is that each step in the process is important and each step varies from perfection. Doubling the actual resolution with which the image is captured is worthwhile, and worth paying for. By contrast there are a couple of features the D40 has that I miss on the D90. The most important is the D40's fast 1/500 flash sync speed, which makes it possible to use fill flash with larger apertures under brighter conditions, and to extend maximum flash range under many conditions. The D90 makes me choose between depth-of-field-isolation and fill flash when conditions are bright as I can't get both. Less important but also helpful is the D40's ability to be set so that the rear screen automatically comes on between shots. Simply tap the shutter (to wake the camera or cancel the review of the previous image, if active) and the display shows you all the camera's vital settings at the same time in one place, and lets you change most of them with just a couple more button-pushes. It is very intuitive and quick to use, and I wish the D90 had it. In most regards I found the D40 to be a superb camera and every bit (more, really) as good as I had been led to expect. It feels wonderful to use and it makes excellent photos, or at least is capable of it (the rest being up to the user.) If it were not for the lack of a focus motor on the D40, I would still recommend it highly for even aspiring serious SLR users, as the other factors can all be worked around or are only of importance under certain conditions. However, the reality for any photographer serious enough to eventually acquire a variety of lenses is that, by the time they buy their third or fourth lens for the D40 they will have spent as much or more on their equipment than they would have had they started one rung up with a D90. Viewed from this perspective, the various functional advantages of the D90 come essentially without cost even though they do, at least for me, add significant value. For casual photographers who will be satisfied with one or two lenses, or for more serious photographers looking for a second, lighter camera for part-time use, the D40 represents an excellent value and would be in my view a five-star camera. For people on a strict budget who are willing to wait patiently for the functionality that will come from additional lenses, the D40 could also be an excellent (and perhaps only) choice. Only people looking at the D40 as an entry point to an eventual comprehensive collection of SLR gear need to consider whether the D40's disadvantages outweigh its lower cost. These people might find themselves, as I did, better off paying more from the start for something along the lines of a D90 - or, alternatively, considering an older used D80/200, etc. as their entry point instead. Yes, the D40 is an upgrade compared to those cameras in some ways, but with a used D80 you can start getting the lenses you want right from the beginning, then upgrade the camera later.

Very Good camera the Nikon D40 Digital SLR camera worth the Price Just the Right Size not to bulky yet to start taking Photos the setting are easy to set up with the camera

Es de segunda mano pero está muy bien.