A Door Into Ocean (Elysium Cycle, 1)

"Door Into Ocean" is a subset of sci-fi, "varying humanoids on multiple planets." It follows a young adult human from a patriarchal planet as he interacts with the single-sex pacifist egalitarian race of the nearest planet, becoming involved in their efforts to maintain balance on their planet and resist exploitation. It includes themes of: ecological balance, consensus versus coercion, economic exploitation, phallocentric perceptions of sex versus relational perceptions, language as it creates and defines culture, definitions of mental illness, and responsibility as it relates to adulthood, self-knowledge, and civic identity.Honestly I can't express just how intensely I love this book. I just finished my fourth re-read, and I got more from it than ever before. It is an amazing allegory on so many different levels, most of all about the nature of hierarchy and reciprocity. I love the thoroughness of world-building, the depth and evolution of characters, the variety of personalities, and the many layers of meaning. If I could get everyone to read one fiction book, this would be the one I would choose.Content note: a possible trigger is a rape that happens on page 266. It's very briefly described, and in terms of the victim's point of view. No detail or attempt at glamorizing.Characters: The characters are all cis, all non-disabled, almost all normatively sized. The main characters consist of: Spinel, a poor, occasionally homeless dark-skinned straight man; Merwen, Usha, and Lystra who are queer, agender, bald, purple female humanoids with webbed hands and feet (Sharers); Lady Berenice who is an upper-class, rich & powerful straight white woman; and Realgar who is a rich & powerful straight white man. The characterizations are complex, showing not only who the characters are now and through the events of the book, but also enough history to deeply understand their motivations, even for the antagonists (without being so much history that it distracts from the flow of the plot).Point of view: 3rd person, following Spinel, Merwen, and Berenice by turns.Imagination: Concepts I hadn't seen before  ] included language with no subject-object relationship where instead all relationships are reciprocal; a single-sex race who reproduce exclusively through genetic science; clothing as a shameful kind of dishonesty; skin-dwelling microbes that function as a scuba tank; microbes designed to eat pollutants; insects and cetaceans used to communicate over distance; carved stones used to signify rank and occupation throughout the culture (even among the poor); many other aspects!  ]This is the most imaginative book I have ever read in the sense that the author created a unique humanoid race and considered their environment thoroughly in relation to the design of their bodies and the development of their culture. As a pacifist, egalitarian communal culture, there were NO obvious inconsistencies.Issues: the biggest issue I saw was the conflation of mental illness and desire to control or cause harm. While it might make sense in a world that sees pacifism and respect as the healthy norm, it still reproduces the modern stereotype that says people who kill are all mentally ill and mentally ill people are dangerous. I think this should have been handled differently. I also was disturbed to note some fat-phobic description of the one person who was described as large - but that was only one line of the book.Plot: The plot was a little slow for the first 20 pages, but then settled into a steady, active pace that got a little nerve-wracking but never so slow that I was tempted to skim. There was nothing I noticed that seemed superfluous.Setting: Mostly this takes place on Shora, a world of ocean with natural rafts which grow on top of the water and form the dwelling places for Sharers. A small part of it takes place on Valedon, a planet of multiple cultures which serves the Patriarch. The Patriarch is considered a god, and acts as an interplanetary authority which enforces a certain level of scientific control to prevent humans from engaging in widespread damage (such as biological or nuclear warfare).Dialogue: There's only a bit more description than dialogue, making this a fairly easy read. The dialogue is varied from character to character and through the development of the book, as well. It passes the Bechdel test with ease.Writing style: The style is simple, clear, and matter-of-fact, with a good bit of omniscient exposition. Sensations and emotions are given by narration, which for me makes them feel more of a fact of the story and thus weaves all the characters together in a tapestry of feeling, thinking, sensing.Length, cover: 403 pages in trade paperback. The cover pictures a bald pink-white person in a water tank, with webbed fingers and a tiny fly inexplicably in the water. The artist clearly did not read what the Sharers are supposed to look like. Why is there a white person on the cover? Sharers are dark purple most of the time. Why is the fly in water? Why is this person modestly covering their body in a way a Sharer would never do? I would guess it is supposed to be a clickfly, but they're supposed to be the size of a dinner plate. The original cover for the mass-market paperback is far better. The feel of the cover is weird, as the person is captured and a gun is propped against the door, but the person looks content and self-conscious. I don't know what message i am meant to take from it but I hate it.Author: Joan Slonczewski, feminist, white, age 30 at the time of writing this in 1986, Quaker, cisgender, seemingly straight woman from northeast US.Context of this reviewer: White, afab, genderfree, trans, queer, non-disabled, poly, add-pi neurodivergent, poor, intersectional feminist, age 32, from southern US.

Written by a Quaker, on an entirely ocean moon, with an all female species, committed to pacifism- this novel has it all! Slonczewski's Friend background breathes through the book, where the Sharers, the moon people, have regular meetings, "gatherings", in order to determine the action that needs to happen, by consensus. If one person disagrees then no action is taken. They are committed to nonviolent action not as a means to an end but a way of life itself- and they are very good at it. And it seems that long ago they produced women only.Then trade begins with a much more violent-prone planet which they orbit, with both genders of humans, ruled by a distant patriarch. It's basically like our planet. And with the trade comes traditional ideas of control and power. A few representatives of the moon rise up to advocate for those on the planet, arguing that they are people as well, and that there can be healthy interaction between the moon and the planet.Slonczewski has rich character development and keeps the reader on the edge of the seat with novel plot twists. It is also real. The best kind of Sci-Fi changes a few parameters and lets real life develop from there. Here, if we posit the beginnings of a female pacifist ocean moon, it all makes sense. The nonviolent action doesn't always work out as we would like, and our friends are not always friendly. Just because the women are pacifists doesn't mean they are good or always agree. But, as in real life, nonviolent action here is effective also.The one downer in the novel is some lesbian interaction, which thankfully is minimal. The incredibly great aspect of the novel is how it puts you into a Pacifist mindset, thinking along the lines of active resistance without violence. For it is not just tactics, but a way of being. The Sharers greet each other with "Share the day" and speak of "learn-sharing" or "food-sharing"- for all actions in their language are reflexive. To give birth to a baby is to be given birth by the baby into motherhood. Their names are their worst faults, such as "Usha the Inconsiderate"- a name chosen when they become an adult as a reminder of what they need to try to overcome for the rest of their lives. I think we would be far better off looking at our own faults like this continually. And even their understanding of death as the last door, which you enter and then are reborn, has the metaphorical image of life only through death. They constantly affirm that we are doers who act- we choose- even choosing death at times, but it is our decision. This awareness that they are in control means that there is not the need for violence to get their way, or even to get their way. It is the way of the Gospel- the way the Kingdom *should* look this side of Eternity. Would that we all lived more as Sharers.

For me, some of the cardinal sins of epic science fiction include sloppy world-building and telling rather than showing. Ms. Slonczewski avoided these traps magnificently. She constructs her world of Shora with incredible detail - its science, philosophy, language, society, and wildlife - with a fantastic but believable outcome. She doles out these details through dialogue and narrative over time without stopping to handhold the reader through new concepts. The story centers around several humans from wildly different backgrounds and how they clash and eventually begin to reach understanding of one another. I found the pacing of this mutual understanding brilliant - to the final page. The author's themes of feminism, pacifism, and environmental custodianship are organic within the story rather than a lecture from the pulpit. Though written decades ago, the themes are more relevant than ever. I highly recommend this to anyone who loves to be immersed in strange new worlds.

This book was beautifully written. I don’t think I’ve come across something so engaging since Starhawk’s Fifth Sacred Thing and City of Refuge. The author really thought out and weaved important themes of non-violence, regenerative ways of being and whole systems thinking. As we look to the type of future we’d like to have (and that which we’d be better off avoiding) I highly recommend this book.

Read this first in 70s. Created a world of water and rafts for populations. Science which relies on biochemistry and rejects ‘stone’ elements. Clash of cultures of cooperative water planet and authoritarian larger planet. Excellent

I loved this novel, conceptually & for its remarkable characters. Much to think about & a story to provoke deep unsights about the current political moment.