Anna [DVD]

"Anna" is the perfect vehicle for Sally Kirkland to absolutely shine in. If you check her filmography on imdb, you'll see what a workhorse of an actress this woman, is. This film contains one of her very best performances. She portrays Anna, who is living in exile in NY; after having been imprisoned just after the invasion of Czechoslavakia in 1968. Anna had been a Czech film star of considerable fame before that event.In NY, present day, Anna is a struggling stage actress. When a young Czech girl, Krystyna comes to America to find "Anna", her heroine, the story gets its teeth. Paulina Porizkova also turns in a good performance, but true to the spirit of the film, the chemistry between Kirkland and Porizkova is the most fascinating element.Anna and her lover teach Krystyna english, and help her start her own career as an actress. Krystyna's presence in Anna's life causes her to reflect upon her own life and choices.By the final scene of the movie, you'll find yourself on the edge of your emotional seat. It's not your usual "aging actress / ingenue" scenario. I recommend this film to anyone who enjoys studying women in film. Sally Kirkland leaves her mark with this one.

Filmed in 30 days for under $1 Million Dollars in the fall of 1986 "Anna" is one of the greatest independent films ever made. When it debuted at the San Francisco Film Festival in the spring of 1987 film critics started cheering about Sally Kirkland's performance as Anna and it is truly a standout performance. Ms. Kirkland won the Golden Globe Award Best Actress Motion Picture Drama, Independent Spirit Award Best Actress, Los Angeles Film Critics Best Actress Award, and was nominated for an Academy Award Best Actress in the spring of 1988. How Sally didn't win the Oscar and lost to Cher in "Moonstruck" is a mystery, that may never be solved. If you like strong female performances, you will love this gem of a film!

Dvd works, which is all I require of it. And as a difficult to procure film, I was thrilled with the ease and price for which I was able to purchase it here.

This film i have been looking everywhere to find so i pleasantly suprised to find it at Amazon. It is a great drama with some very fine acting from Sally Kirkland. Paulina Porizkova is quite good also. I recommend it to anyone who loves good cinema

I've had the pleasure of working with Oscar nominee and Golden Globe winning actress Sally Kirkland on my project 'African Chelsea' (screening at Cannes). She is an amazing person and talent. In 'Anna' she really shines -

HorribleWant my money & 5 minutes back!

What ever happened to the "Choose Your Own Adventure" series? For a while there was talk that films would transform into that genre with viewers making the ultimate decision on what would happen to the protagonist and the final climax. It was a fleeting moment, full of hope, but insecurities. One wonders about this idea, what would happen if audiences had the option to control the fate of characters, to make their own decisions about their legitimacy, or to just make coherent moments of our random tangents. One can dream, right? In 1987, a film was made purely to showcase the talent of one aging star. It was funded with hopes of bringing stronger roles, powerful characters, and ultimately a common household name. It was made to win awards and that is all - no focused plot, no understandable character drive, no defined purposes - just to showcase the range of one actress and that is all. That film was "Anna", and the star was Sally Kirkland. A drama at its very core, "Anna" displays that genuine truth that all actors age, and sometimes, fade away. Anna is a character that believes America is her safety net, her home, and it can do her no wrong - but she refuses to belittle herself to do work she doesn't believe in. She is hard-nosed, optimistic, stubborn, and arrogant when it comes to her life, yet not afraid to let others in, yet drop them at a moments notice. Anna flip-flops between personalities, which makes this film ideal of an aging star, but not idea of the viewing audience. "Anna" has been praised for its star Sally Kirkland, and her ability to get "grungy" for the role, but a month into 2008, "Anna" does not remain a staple of film culture. It is dated, dull, and formulaically chaotic.Director Yurek Bogayevicz has a message hidden within "Anna" about the falsehoods of Czechoslovakia, both politically and socially, but Kirkland refuses to let them upstage her. Bogayevicz is not afraid to play with the camera, to use wooden frames to allow Kirkland to stand out, and he is not afraid to lessen the surrounding characters so that when you walk away from the film, it is Kirkland you remember. If it isn't obvious, this film didn't sit well with me. From the opening of the first act and deep within the second, "Anna" felt like a high school theater production. The characters were non-existent, there was no enlightening pre-story, and there was no definition of time or place. There was Sally Kirkland, stubbornly saying that she is better than the other actresses vying for the same lifestyle that she wants. Randomly she encounters a friend, a young girl that has also traveled a long distance to get to America for the glitz and glamour, and two of them (within the span of 20 minutes) build a friendship that could break all walls. It is emotionally boring and unbelievable. Again, randomly, we meet Anna's boyfriend Daniel (played by the weak Robert Fields), who brings nothing to the table in terms of definition or character - only to boost the attention onto Kirkland's Anna. Through the course of nearly two hours, we watch as more random acts coupled with unnamed characters intertwine together to feebly create a story that is held together by loose threads - and SALLY KIRKLAND. Arg, it pains me to continue to say this but "Anna" could have been a fantastic film had Bogayevicz presented equal time between Anna, Daniel, and Krystina, but instead we are forced into a one-sided game where emotional scenes speak louder than plot.Is this where Charlize Theron found inspiration for her beauty-less role in "Monster", or Halle Berry in "Monster's Ball"? Was Sally Kirkland one of the early actresses discover that by letting themselves go for a character Oscar will shine in their direction? Throughout this film I was disgusted by Kirkland's portrayal of Anna, and Bogayevicz's lack of excitement for anything else fluent. Bogayevicz gives us an Anna that doesn't work hard for her parts, doesn't care for others, and is generally mean spirited - yet we are to feel sympathy for her? Near the beginning of the film, she forces what she wants to do onto others, and gets upset when she doesn't get her way. Sure, aging actresses my have that appeal to them, but Kirkland creates a more childish character instead of a mature one. That is where "Anna" could have improved. If this was a mature Kirkland, I would have gobbled it up, but this stammering childish Anna was impossible to believe. While my favorite scene was near the end where Anna goes to watch one of her older films playing (included is absurd make-out characters) and the film burns, this scene is also one of my least favorite. Anna has made a phenomenal life for herself, creating films and building the dream, yet when anyone else wants to enter that spotlight, she gets jealous and outraged. This didn't make for a character I wanted to stand behind nor win Oscars. Coupled with the classic 80s background synthesizer, the outrageous over-the top wardrobe, and the displaced ending (where did that come from and what happened??) - "Anna" slipped far in the scope of amazing cinema. It was a show-piece, an opportunity for an aging star to yell at the world one more time. In this one it worked, but I don't think I will be fooled again.Overall, I cannot say that I was impressed with this film. "Anna" is not a film about an aging film star; it is about Sally Kirkland, and ONLY Sally Kirkland. Bogayevicz tries to do more with the story, but fails either because Kirkland will not allow him or he just realizes that there isn't enough to support a full story. There are one or two decent scenes in this film, but nothing that promotes this film as innovative or influential. Bogayevicz did not create a character that audiences would believe, tear up for, or dedicate a Sunday afternoon with - he created an annoyance. Kirkland wasn't Anna, she was an actress playing her a bit overdone and crusty on the sides. Perhaps I missed the scope of this film, but what makes films like this work is the cooperation of everyone involved. That wasn't the case here. In "Anna", Kirkland orders Daniel to act like a dog (apparently as a symbolic act) and yet during the entire emotional scene, I couldn't help but think that was what Kirkland was like to those on the set. She didn't make this into a film, she transformed it into her own production, and because of it "Anna" failed. I cannot suggest this to anyone - from one Czech to another - skip it!Grade: * ½ out of ***** (for that pesky theater scene that creeped me out)

“Anna” is an independent movie released in the United States in 1987. As an independent movie, it not only attracted the attention of the academy, but it also won many awards. The movie, directed by Polish director Yurek Bogavevicz and written by female Polish screenwriter Agnieszka Holland, is an explicit demonstration of indisputable, genuine talent. The main star of “Anna,” actress Sally Kirkland, won a Golden Globe, an Independent Spirit Award, and a Los Angeles Film Critics Association Award for her remarkable performance. The movie, produced by Zanne Devine, ultimately made its way to the Oscars—it made Kirkland an Oscar-nominee. Superlatives characterize each and every trait of the film and of Kirkland’s performance. I urge Criterion to add “Anna” to its collection.