Hereafter

easy fit

Good movie

This film is a bit of a downer but I enjoyed the theme and synchronicities between the characters. There is potential for a happy ending.

I have now watched this twice (since receiving it a few days ago). First of all - thanks, Amazon, for sending a free rental download to my Kindle Cloude when the purchase was made. I work long hours, with a hefty commute into town - so to be able to begin watching at home, then watch the rest on the train coming into work - wonderful.The film? I don't want to give anything away. Too much information would spoil it. I can tell you that I sat down to watch this film, no expectations, no idea of where it would take me, or what journey Eastwood wanted to share with the rest of us.Every new film I see with "directed by Clint Eastwood" on it, i find a new aspect to this man that i like - as a director, who knows how to unobtrusively lay out a story, draw the best performances from his actors, have a point.... you may not agree with everything that comes out of this man - I sure as shootin' have a few issues with him - but then i see another one of his films, and thank the maker (or whatever) that he chose to pursue directing as one of his acts of human expression.And he even scores his films, wrapping the wonderful choices in music he's picked, with musical compositions that come from some special place in his heart, his head - who knows? Clint Eastwood never ceases to surprise me, and contintually reveals a talent for, if nothing else (and there's plenty!), picking subject matters that others might pass by....I doubt this movie would have been made without the CE stamp of approval on it. I am not sure what the audience is out there for such a thoughtful, thought-provoking film.All i can say to end this "review" is:If you have a hankerin' to question why we're here, where we came from, where we're going, what exactly is it, to be alive, and to be dead?....This film will not answer those questions for you....but you will learn that you are not alone in your quest for answers...and regardless of what faith you follow (or not), this film will touch you, likely, give you hope in a way that is hard to explain....and the (Clint Eastwood) music/theme will haunt you long after the credits roll....He's the Man!....Thank you, Mr. Eastwood....

I'm not going to write some kind of professional analysis of this movie. All I can say is that after seeing the trailers, it was not anything like what I was expecting. I think people who like movies about death and dying are looking for one of two things - either an inspired answer to their questions, or a thrill. This gave neither.I watched this just a couple of days after the Japan earthquake, so perhaps I was looking for something to answer that kind of devastation. The special effects of the filming of this tsunami was good...perhaps the best part of the film. But having subtitles while they spoke French was distracting and unnecessary since she spoke English during the rest of the movie. Between her, the child who loses his twin, and the psychic, there were three very interesting characters, but the storyline between the three just didn't make much sense. Compared to Travolta's "City of Angels" or even "Michael", it didn't hold a candle. I'm not religious, so wasn't looking for that angle...I just wanted some new idea, new revelation about the afterlife, or at least a riveting story, and I'm afraid it didn't deliver any of them.I know it's politically incorrect to say so, but I think Clint Eastwood was a better actor than he is a filmmaker. I don't recommend it unless you just want to watch a movie to pass the time. I'm glad I didn't pay $8 at the theatre to see it.

Bought used works like a charm watched it 3 times loved it a lot of French but still loved it !

Good acting. Interesting movie.

Fantastic movie - Directed and scored by Clint Eastwood. Wonderful, intriguing, imaginative (or somewhat true?) screenplay by Peter Morgan about persons connected by death in similar ways (see Wikipedia) that will keep you spellbound. Cinematography is beautiful. Incredible video of tsunami in India. Brings together persons in the realistic realm of the Hereafter. Matt Damon and Cécile de France are perfect in their roles. One of my favorite movies!

Fonctionnel et en très bon état tel qu’écrit dans la description

Très beau film, très touchant, dommage que la boîte du CD était cassée.......

Very moving would be one of the best epithets for this film, Produced and Directed by Clint Eastwood, who is now respected for his Directing integrity as much as an Actor. His ethic according to commentaries in Special Features is to enjoy every minute of the production. Surpringly some of the action was filmed in the enormous water tanks at the Pinewood Studios in England.Cecile de France, plays Marie, a top ranking French Journalist on holiday with her boss/partner, when she is the victim of a tsaumi, overtaken by a tidal wave sweeping the resort, as she shops for gifts, for her partner's kids. She has a death experience before being revived, which haunts her, and leads her to write a book about it, but publishing is difficult.Matt Damon plays George, who has a psychic gift, and works now as a fork lift driver, to avoid his former publicity, and the attempts of his brother to exploit him. After being made redundant, he travells to London, to visit the Museum Home of Charles Dickens, his favourite Author.Here the third member of the trio involved with paranormal psychic activity, is Marcus, a London Twin who loses his brother Jason in a road accident, and who is in foster care because their Mother is an alcoholic. The twins are played by Frankie and George McLaren, excellently. Jason has apparently saved Marcos from a bomb blast in the London Underground, like a guardian spirit, by causing him to miss a train. The film cleverly explores the many avenues of possible fake and genuine Psychic and Spiritual involvement, as Marcus searches for someone to reunite him with his twin in the afterlife.All from diferent walks of life they converge at a London Book Fair where Marie is signing her new Book, entitled 'Hereafter'. Derek Jacobi, as himself is reading Dickens, and George goes to hear him, and also buys Marie's book, producing a psychic reflex, as they touch. At that moment Marcus who is visiting with his Foster Parents recognises George from an old website, and follows him to his hotel.George finally agrees to a session, and sets his mind at rest so he can move on.Clever Marcus locates Marie's hotel for George, and they meet, possibly happy ever after, and probably Hereafter.Matt Damon plays this part with great sensitivity, and Cecile de France portays a once successful public figure now an embarrassment struggling to get back on track, with harrowing realism; and the Twin boys appear to be incredibly accomplished and intelligent actors.Both discs have excellent quality, but only the ordinary DVD, contains the Special Features, and Commentaries.A haunting piano theme accompanies a lot of the action. The subject matter is not ground breaking, and it certainly is not a horror film, though it deals with situations which are horrific, but it is so thoughtfully produced that this film is definitely not one to miss.

... ist die höchste Herausforderung für einen Filmemacher. Clint Eastwood wird nachgesagt, dass er inzwischen bei Drehbüchern, die ihm gefallen, nicht mehr lange umschreibt oder zu Tode entwickeln lässt -- vermutlich auch, weil er spürt, dass er (Jahrgang 1930) nicht mehr ewig Zeit hat. Eine Drehbuchfassung von 2008 ist mit dem 2009 verfilmten Buch jedenfalls weitestgehend identisch. Zu "Hereafter" sagte er in einem Interview mit der NY Times, er nähere sich der Frage, ob es ein Jenseits gibt und wie es ist, aus der Position eines Menschen, der "nicht weiß".Ist es diese gewisse Demut, oder wieder einmal die Kombination von hochmotivierten Schauspielern, dem Drehbuch, in dem die wichtigen Fragen alle noch enthalten sind, und Eastwoods auf die Geschichte konzentriertem Regiestil, die diesen Film ausmacht? Ich habe festgestellt, dass die Logik, die Charaktere der drei Stränge gegen Ende zusammenzuführen (das ahnt man ja), mich nicht störte, trotz der Vorhersehbarkeit. Zu dem Zeitpunkt hatten die sehr unterschiedlichen Figuren mich bereits in ihren Bann geschlagen. Cécile le Frances Charakter Marie, das zunächst unbekümmerte "Medienkind", eine TV-Journalistin, die ohne innere Turbulenzen als Geliebte ihres Magazinchefs auf Reisen ist, kann mit der Veränderung, die ihre Nahtodeserfahrung in ihrer Seele hinterlässt, nicht mehr umgehen. Sie fällt aus ihrem Leben heraus und findet ein Neues, langsam, schrittweise. Matt Damons George, der Werksarbeiter mit dem Hellseherfluch, hat seine Reifung bereits hinter sich, als er der überdreht-liebenswerten Melanie begegnet (Bryce Dallas Howard). Die vorsichtige Romanze, die sich anbahnt, nimmt eine überraschende Wendung (Melanies Reaktion auf Georges Botschaft ist eine Oscarleistung in zehn Sekunden, schade, dass das wohl kein Verantwortlicher bemerkt hat). Der Zwillingsbruder Marcus, dem seine zweite Hälfte Jason abhanden gekommen ist, durchläuft seinen Trauerprozeß mit der Entschlossenheit eines Kindes, das weiss, das es sich *jetzt* darum kümmern muss. Es kann noch nicht anders.Die Darstellung der Momente, in denen die Grenzen unserer täglichen Wahrnehmung durchbrochen sind (insbesondere Georges Visionen) wurde weise auf Schemen und Sekundenbruchteile beschränkt. Auch beim jetzt dritten Mal entfaltet der Film seine tröstliche Aussage -- keine Angst haben zu müssen. Ob Sie mit diesem Film etwas anfangen können, wird wohl damit zusammenhängen, ob diese Frage ("ist da noch etwas?") in Ihrem Leben eine Quelle von Neugierde oder von Angst ist. Ein Actionfilm ist das nicht, auch wenn er so anfängt. Eher ein Arthousefilm mit Hollywoodbudget. Arthouse im positivsten Sinne, meine ich: konzentriert auf seine Charaktere und voller Empathie.Auch wenn der Schluss nicht ganz so genial ist wie der Rest des Films, gebe ich die volle Punktzahl. Dieser Film ist unterhaltsam und anrührend; und ich glaube auch, dass er "wichtig" ist ... weil er Menschen, die nicht täglich mit spirituellen Fragen umgehen (wollen), ein Hintertürchen aufmacht, ohne sie zu indoktrinieren.

I bought Hereafter (released in 2010) in July 2019 from Amazon. I knew nothing about it in advance, except that one of its main characters has psychic abilities, and that the film had received a lot of bad reviews and a lot of superlative reviews but nothing much in between. I didn't read any synopsis of the plot or any of the reviews. I just went into it cold.I've now watched Hereafter five times.At the end of the first viewing, I thought, "Huh??" The movie had stopped but it didn't seem to have reached a conclusion. I was ready to give it maybe 1 star out of 4 (mainly because of the first 10 minutes, which I won't describe because it's a spoiler).But, knowing that the critical reviews were so strongly divided, I decided to watch it again the next night. After the second viewing, I was giving it 3 stars out of 4; and I started reading the reviews.A couple of months later I watched it a third time. More things were falling into place. By now, I was giving it 3½ stars out of 4. And during the recent pandemic lockdown, I've watched it twice more. Now I definitely rate it as 4 stars out of 4.At one point along the way I suddenly recognised that there's no definite article in the title of the movie: there's no "The" in front. The title is simply Hereafter. And the ordinary meaning of that word is "from this point onwards" or "from now on".To my mind, the movie is really about how the major characters will move forward in their lives here on this Earth, in the wake of the experiences that they have had and we have witnessed. It isn't about anybody's afterlife. That also goes for the tormented psychic, George, who has visions of ghostly figures that seem to represent dead loved ones remembered by people who come to him for readings.The movie also leaves the viewer to notice how limited George's abilities are. He isn't a charlatan; he is genuine and earnest. He doesn't pretend to predict the future. Subjects who come to him for a reading find that he tells them things they already know, or could have known in their subconscious without wishing to acknowledge them. His abilities may amount to no more than some sort of telepathy. In giving a reading, George is unlocking those unacknowledged thoughts in his subjects' minds. And by the end of the film, George himself is unlocked too.(A sample of reviews by the professionals: The late Roger Eberts of the Chicago Sun-Times found it enthralling (rating: 4 stars out of 4). Peter Bradshaw of The Guardian called it a bizarre and baffling turkey (rating: 1 out of 5). Rick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle said it was one of the best things Clint Eastwood had ever done (rating: 5 out of 5). Deborah Ross of The Spectator called it a leaden mess.)