





๐ Upgrade your network, upgrade your edge.
The 10Gtek 10Gb PCI-E NIC Network Card features a single copper RJ45 port supporting 100MbE to 10GbE speeds, powered by the Intel X550-AT2 controller for stable, high-performance networking. Compatible with major server OSes and virtualization platforms, it offers PCIe v3.0 x4 connectivity, advanced offloading capabilities, and flexible installation with included low-profile brackets. Ideal for data centers and professional setups demanding reliable, ultra-fast Ethernet.



















| ASIN | B076P9PPWN |
| Best Sellers Rank | #11,994 in Computers & Accessories ( See Top 100 in Computers & Accessories ) #9 in Network Interface Cards |
| Brand | 10Gtek |
| Brand Name | 10Gtek |
| Color | X550-10G-1T(1xRJ45) |
| Colour | X550-10G-1T(1xRJ45) |
| Compatible Devices | Server, Desktop, Virtual Machine |
| Compatible Operating System Family | Linux, Windows |
| Customer Reviews | 4.6 out of 5 stars 38 Reviews |
| Data Link Protocol | IEEE 802.1Q |
| Data Transfer Rate | 10 Gigabytes Per Second |
| Hardware Interface | PCIE x 4 |
| Manufacturer | 10Gtek |
| Manufacturer Part Number | X550-T1(Intel-1pc) |
| Model Number | X550-T1(Intel-1pc-EU)-U |
| Number of Items | 1 |
| Number of Packs | 1 |
R**E
Easy installation and great compatibility!
Installation was a breeze. I plugged in the card, downloaded and installed the drivers, and it was up and running almost immediately. Extremely convenient and has excellent compatibility.
M**E
Great for high end multi gig connections and gaming
Works as described, hardware offloading lowers cpu usage, and full throughput is possible. If you have a high end server or are a hardcore gamer with a multi gig internet connection, get it! X550 chipset is the gold standard.
F**T
Work in Synology 1517+
I bought this in hopes it would work in my Synology DS1517+ - and IT WORKED! Straight out of the box, plug and pray worked - have it connected to a Netgear GS110MX switch that has 2 10Gbit RJ45 ports and it is working great at 400-500MBps without any optimization. I would have been using the latest DSM as of this writing so drivers exist in that DSM. Much lower cost than what the official compatible 10000BaseT cards are listed at Synology. So far so good.
R**D
Works on Fedora KDE desktop
Context: I'm on a daily-driven Fedora (v44 on KDE) desktop. My current MB's NIC is a "Marvell AQtion AQC113C". My ISP speed at the wall is 2Gbps up/down. While the AQC113C worked, there appeared to be a known-bug specifically with Aquatic (Marvell branded) NICs when your speed is set to 2.5GbE on Linux systems. After a few days, the controller essentially gets corrupted and i have to reboot the system. That's frustrating as the system is used for local network AI inferencing, transcoding videos as a Tdarr node, and I often SSH/remote into it when I'm away. I need the machine on and available. I read this Intel controller has a good history of reliability on linux systems so that's why I picked it The review: Speaking for the X550-10G-1T model - Installed on a PCIe 4x slot. The notes from the seller are correct 2500/5000 speeds will need manual adjustment first but will work. Screenshot 1 is the "ethtool enp6s0" output. Note the red square those options didn't show until I ran a "nmcli connection modify" change and rebooted. Blue square shows speed I set. 2nd screenshot is the X550 controller. ISP speed test returned favorable at expected speeds 2234mbps down / 2091mbps up. So far the built-in driver is working well. Besides the manual 2500 adjustment, it was technically a plug-in-play experience. The small card fits as expected. 10gig is overkill for my intended use but I wanted "future proofing" and reliability
S**Z
Zero issues. Well priced compared to other intel X550 cards.
Works perfectly. Downloaded driver from intel site. Functions identically to other intel X550 cards which are much more expensive. If you have a PCIx8 available the X540 is better priced and the same performance(except less power efficiency) but I only had a x4 slot. The Aquantia AQC107 cards are also x4 and much cheaper but their performance is bad unless you enable jumbo frames which isn't supported by my router, and latency & jitter & impracticality of configuring every device makes me question if it would be worth enabling even if it did.
Trustpilot
5 days ago
2 months ago