NAVEKULL Men's Fleece Lined Hiking Pants Softshell Water Resistance Snow Ski Pants Winter Outdoor Tactical Cargo Trousers

Very well made and fit great. I would order again.

Si me agradó es muy buena calidad y confortable para mi trabajo cálido para el frío y el agua

Great price don’t need long John’s with these pants great!

Los recomiendo

They wear well. They wash well. And they are warm and comfortable.

Comfortable but a little big. Size 30-30 Definitely runs a little bigger... Worth the money though.

Upon ordering the pants everything was good except they gave only waist sizes. I ordered a 34 and it apparently only goes to a 32 length. Too short. Nice pants but no use for a pair of “highhwater” pants in the winter! I’ll return them.

The bulk of reviewer opinion seems to be that these pants run a bit big. I prefer to think of them as being wonderfully flexible. All pants (and all belts) should be able to stretch in the waist because the position of one's body can change one's waist size. Pants sometimes become uncomfortably tight when I sit, yet tend to slide down when I stand. (At this point in my life I lack a notched waist on which to hook a loose belt.)Elasticity greatly increases comfort. I ordered size 36 in the hope that I would soon be down from 38. It turns out that they are already perfect. Due to the elasticity I can comfortably wear them now, and they will still be fine when I am a true 36. They will also still be fine when I get back down to 34. All waterproof pants work best when they are held up by suspenders, rather than by a snug waist. That way a convective chimney of warm moist air exits the top of one's parka, rather than being trapped inside the waterproof pants.I am puzzled by the comments of some that these pants have covered or waterproofed pocket zippers. It's great that the pants have lots of pockets, and that all of the pockets have zippers, but none of them are covered. I have high standards for serious rain gear, and it is not well designed if it lacks a waterproof flap over every zipper.All rain gear should be a shell. A light lining is fine, even preferable, but no insulation should ever be built in ‒ if extra warmth is needed an extra layer or two should be worn beneath the shell.My experience through decades of winter wilderness mountaineering, and through over twenty years of nearly full-time year-round outdoor work on my land in a very rainy climate, is that everything eventually leaks. Maybe not when it's new, but it will wind up leaking. (This is especially true of the shoulders of jackets, which are directly pounded by rain and are subjected to lots of movement, and it is also true of pants, especially in the crotch, stressed by movement, or stressed by the pressures of bicycling, or subjected to crawling around in snow cave tunnels for long periods.)It is important that one be able to remove and replace wet insulation (and to possibly dry it out if the sun shines or if there is some time indoors). No claim is made in the description that these pants have taped seams, or are otherwise seam-sealed. If they were seam-sealed, that would be a bragging point. One should assume that these pants will have leaky seams.Still, I like these pants a great deal. They appear to be sturdily constructed, with substantial attention to detail, using nice material that has a bit of stretch. I like the gray color I ordered, and the loose jean-like tailoring is pleasing and comfortable. These are not rain pants, and they are not a shell, though the insulation is not thick or heavy. A layer could be worn under them, but even worn alone they would soon become too warm during substantial activity in wet weather, even if the activity doesn't reach an aerobic level.I would be perfectly comfortable wearing these pants in cold weather tobogganing or cross-country skiing. They would be excellent for that. They'd also be fine for hiking in cold dry weather, and fine for hiking day trips in chilly rainy weather if one is carrying an extra sweater to offset the possibility that the pants insulation could become damp. The relative tightness of the cuffs makes them unsuitable for downhill skiing with bulky boots.For being good-looking pants that are comfortable and probably durable, have many zippered pockets, and function well in the conditions for which they are suited, I give them a 5.