Eaters of Children: The Pedocracy Exposed: How access to power is granted through the rape, torture and ritualistic slaughter of the innocent.
A**R
Who would eat a child?
Consumption can be defined as digestion of food or to use up completely as in using trees to produce paper. Either way, "Eaters of Children" speaks to the plague of missing and dead children for whom there is no good explanation. The 'milk carton' missing children campaign began to quantify the sheer numbers of children who simply disappeared. Now we know that a combination of malevolent players were and are acquiring young people literally in the public square for the most foul purposes imaginable. Unfortunately, the US is the primary consumer of trafficked children and there does not seem to be any heart to slow or stop the trade. It has become a significant money market, sometimes surpassing illegal drug trade. This book is a hard look at information which brutal to comprehend and extremely difficult to articulate. It is well worth the read and purchase.
E**T
Roman Catholic connections to ritual child slaughter
Johnny Cirucci shows a world system of pedophilia that he terms the "pedocracy." It is a system created by devil worshippers that goes back to Babylon, in which the rape, torture, and ritualistic slaughter of children is committed by people connected to the Roman Catholic Church (the Jesuit Order being the main perpetrators) in order to gain access to power.This books 32 chapters cover the crimes, cover-ups, abductions and deaths of people in a system of control that spans government offices, police, courts, military, media, schools, hospitals, and orphanages (Sisters of Mercy).It covers crimes of Gerald Sandusky, Father Gerald Ridsdale, Laura Silsby, Joseph Schmitz, The Boys Town Cover-Up, Marc Dutroux, Michelle Martin, West Point, Russell Tricker, Sir Peter Telford Hayman, Jeffrey Dahmer, Father Tony Walsh, Father John Geoghan, Sir James Savile, Father Joseph Maskell, PizzaGate, Charles Manson, Fathet Lawrence Murphy, and Alfred Kinsey.And it covers the deaths and/or abductions of Nancy Schaefer, Madeleine McCann, River Phoenix, Polly Klaas, Nancy Schaefer, Steve Branch, Michael Moore, Christopher Byers, Kevin Collins, Emanuela Orlandi, John Gosch, Edward Smith, Alfred Evans, Ann Cesnik, and Simon of Trent.
A**R
This is a book of truths
Excellent book if truths and very well written. I myself am a born again Christian and have been awake to all these truths for about 12 years now. The only thing that keeps me going is my faith in Jesus Christ and the knowledge that Satan and all his minions will one day soon face judgment and Christ will wipe away all the tears of the innocent. Praise Jesus!
G**0
A massive amount of information compressed into single book form. Well sourced.
I was aware of much of this book's contents beforehand, but it has more to offer than exposing Satanism, ritual sex abuse of children and human sacrifice. It thoroughly establishes the importance of the relationships between the world's most evil, uber wealthy political and social elites, military leadership, the global intelligence community and all parts of the entertainment and news media as their true source of empowerment. The belief that Luciferian worship is empowering them is as mythical as the outcome of their horrendous abuses of the innocent. I highly recommend this book whether you are awake to the true nature of our current global pedocracy or have an interest in learning more about the hidden means certain people employ to climb to the highest levels within socioeconomic strata.
B**.
Take off the blindfolds
Rips the blindfolds off the Liciferians who worship Lucifer with the sacrifice of human bodiesRevelations 18/24. And in her (Babylonian Cain/Satan seed) was found the blood of prophets, and saints, and of all that were slain upon the Earth. Wars and Abortion centers are pits of human sacrifice to their god Satan. As was 9/11 twin number 11 ( Satanic number 11) towers. Constructed for that purpose.
J**.
The abuses of children by the Roman 'church' are systematic, not incidental.
Eaters of Children is fundamental. All my life, I've searched for answers to the question of the world and who runs/owns it. This book answers those questions for me I always wondered what motivated the people in charge, and now I finally know. While shocking and disturbing at first, it is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to understand the information found here. I say: 'You can't go wrong buying this one'
P**R
I've bought 3 paperbacks and one copy on kindle and I am completely satisfied with my purchases
Cirucci has done his homework. not a family story but if you are looking for truth then you get 100% within these pages. I've bought 3 paperbacks and one copy on kindle and I am completely satisfied with my purchases. I also listen to his podcasts on you tube. I highly recommend this book
K**M
I read the entire book and most of the footnotes
I wanted to be thorough. Eaters of Children is a horrendous read. It is a mixture of conspiracy theories, some might be true some not, and strong statements labeling persons to be Nazi or Communist or Catholic or Protestant or child murderers with nothing to backup the statements.I’ve read much better researched or at least better sourced materials along the same line as this book. The book is extremely redundant often repeating the same pieces of information in or out of context where they are inserted.Mr. Cirucci repeatedly references other books he has written as being the source for material in this book. Which violates the rules laid out for responsible research and invalidates his writing. Whatever happened to always citing the original source or maybe he is the original source of the statements.I do not recommend anyone read this book. Which is a shame since child trafficking, child abuse of unbelievable cruelty, child murder, and child terrorizing are sadly rampant.Also why is everyone but him an agent of the so-called Satan Simulation. This author punches the political left, right, and middle with equal measures of wrath. He labels Catholicism and Protestantism as being equally corrupt.Jesus stated “there are none righteous, no, not one.” This author definitely agrees with that inspired remark. But somewhere along the way he forgot the “he who is without sin, throw the first stone” thing that Jesus also said.He seems to revile Jews for being agents of the Pope of all things. He reviles Catholics for being agents of Satan. And if he should accidentally read my review, I’m sure he will certainly revile me.
J**C
A Very Important Book
An excellent analysis of the sickening practices of those in power, this book covers so many bases, and makes so many connections between secret societies such as the Jesuit Order and the abuse of the innocent. I highly recommend this book to anyone who wishes to better understand why our world is in such a poor state, or wonders why so little is done about widespread child abuse, and the proliferation of moral degeneracy. Thank you Mr Cirucci for the hard work you have put into exposing the despicable creeps who prey upon innocent children, and seek to corrupt and destroy everything decent in this world.
U**X
Great book
Great book everyone should read. Johnny and his team did a great job uncovering the devil's simulation, we are all in. Wake up good people of earth.
A**"
Not entirely indigestible
I should preface this review by stating that I am neither a Catholic nor a Jesuit, yet have taken to panning this book, nevertheless.For starters, and on a strictly semi-incidental note, EATERS OF CHILDREN is badly in need of what it senselessly lacks, considering a publication of its massive size: namely, an index. Want to know what the author has to say about so-and-so or such-and-such? Sorry. You'll have to trawl through the entire thing to find that out. Thanks a lot.Secondly: The book is badly in need of an editor. To put it another way, there is so much irrelevant material included in this that two words kept leaping off almost every page at me: *Padding Alert!* The fact this book is quite large is more obvious if you've purchased the paper version, as I did.Here's a question: What do Charles Manson and Jeffrey Dahmer have to do with any of this? The answer is obvious (nothing), and yet both have entire chapters devoted to them. There's about forty pages right there that could've easily been omitted on behalf of the reader.Here's another: Why are there numerous paragraphs if not several pages devoted to child actress Shirley Temple, Alfred Kinsey, late actor Robin Williams, Lewis Carroll (who was an Anglican), et cetera? I think I know the answer. Two words: *Padding Alert!*By the time I was finished with EATERS OF CHILDREN here's one reader who felt that a concluding mea culpa was in order. Suffice to say this coffee-table conversation piece tried my patience, not simply on account of its unnecessary length but due to its very motif more than anything else.In EATERS OF CHILDREN the bogeymen are neither ultra-Zionists nor globalists (too vague a term!) but rather, specifically, the Jesuits. Okay, I get that. Still, my main criticism is that the book gets far too bogged down with its highlighting sensational yet isolated cases of reported sexual perversion, all the while attempting (and failing, IMO) to weave together a cohesive thread connecting them to the 'Great Satan.'Cirucci seems to take it for granted that we all believe as he does that the Roman Catholic Church represents what the Book of Revelation refers to as Mystery Babylon. If one does not accept this view, then the author's entire argument collapses like a cathedral of cards, which it does (IMO). No surprise that Cirucci cites Alexander Hislop's "The Two Babylons," a favorite reference among many an anti-Vatican Bible-believer. Truth is, Hislop's scholarship has since been exposed as having been quite shoddy and thus is no longer considered a credible source anymore, especially since the publication of Ralph Woodrow's "The Babylon Connection?" which thoroughly debunked Hislop's rather influential polemic.Parenthetical aside: It is to be noted that from its inception and for about the first two centuries AD the Early Church had subscribed to what is known in today's theological language as 'futurism.' Contrary to what many anti-Zionists and a number of self-professing, biblically illiterate Christians believe, 'futurism' has its foundation entirely in patently clear scriptural doctrine and was not, as some folks proclaim, the product of a Counter-Reformation 'conspiracy,' on the part of past Jesuits Francisco Ribera and Manuel Lacunza who promoted futurism (yes) and invented futurism (no).Although Cirucci is quite dogmatic in his stance of who the so-called 'Whore of Babylon' represents, at present my own research has led me to consider two far more likely suspects identifying the latter-day Antichrist system: namely, A) syncretism, or B) that which author Walid Shoebat so cogently makes the case for in "God's War on Terror" (a logical perspective held by numerous eschatologically sound Christian authors). As to who or what will personify/embody this system, in the form of the 'Abomination of Desolation,' that some oldster in conical hat and a man every bit unmiraculous and charmless would be it, seems entirely unlikely to me. (Constantinople, after all, was not renamed Istanbul simply for nothing.)EATERS OF CHILDREN, at over 800 agonizing pages, is largely a discursive read, written in a disjointed, fragmentary manner, akin to a scrapbook filled with countless newspaper clippings, with a few jottings and commentary notes sprinkled in here and there. Much of the information it contains has been brought out elsewhere in previous works (Dave McGowan's "Programmed to Kill," as just one example). There is very little if any continuity from one chapter to the next as it all seems thrown together and makes for an overall unconvincing textual hodgepodge.In conclusion, I would like to respond to two specific items:1) I would agree with Cirucci that Joe Atwill's primary argument put forth in "Caesar's Messiah" is utter nonsense but aside from that indisputable fact, Atwill himself has done a lot to try and expose much of what is of Cirucci's concern in EATERS OF CHILDREN. Moreover, Atwill has openly addressed the issue of his in his youth having attended a school, in which he admits to a couple educators there having been Jesuits. Big deal. This does not make Atwill an agent of the Jesuits, as he has since repeatedly spoken out against this society as a whole.2) Although I am not a follower of Alex Jones, I here feel the need to defend one of his documentary films. In EATERS OF CHILDREN, Cirucci expresses his suspicion with regard to Jones' claim that he crashed a Bohemian Grove ceremony, in order to video-record its secret goings-on. Personally, I believe Jones' footage was genuine and his motives for making "Dark Secrets Inside Bohemian Grove" sincere, and consider the idea that he was not out to expose the Grove per se but that his sole purpose was to give viewers a whitewashed false impression of it, a highly unfair criticism, considering Jones has spent most of his adult life tirelessly attempting to raise public awareness as to the corrupt if not outright satanic hidden lives of the elites in general.There is a word I would describe for theories such as these two of Cirucci's which I have just refuted and several others that are entertained in this book (like the one that has people seeing disturbing images in certain animated movies made for children) -- and it isn't 'Rome.' The word is 'conspiranoia.' Wild do some imaginations run!
A**R
That's Johnny
I used this book to gain knowledge of the things I never knew and Johnny gives that in all his books. The worst part is finding out that it's all true.
R**S
Some truth, alot of conspiracy.
The author presents collated factual evidence from cases where the church and high ranking people and celebrities have been involved in pedophilic activity which I commend him for.The issue I see here is that while the author presents factual evidence to expose the church aswell as the wealthy engaging in documented pedophilic activity, unfortunately he looses credibility when he tries to draw lines of corelation between the events occurred to occult symbolism and starts to reference the Bible. His conspiracies would probably be more beleivable if his statements on the symbolism and meanings he is reffering to where historically correct to begin with.For example in the Bohemian Grove portion of the book, he opens the chapter with an excerpt about Molech worship and child sacrifice from the Bible and then goes on to try to conclude that the events at bohemian Grove where related to Molech worship, when it's proven that not only is the Bible a historically flawed source of material to refference, as it's been proven time and time again archeologically that the events, cultures of the peoples and religious practices of those cultures, differed greatly to what is portrayed within the Bible, but that the author claims that the owl idol worshipped in bohemian Grove is Moloch, when historically speaking, Molech who was one of the deities of the Ammonites during the bronze age was depicted as a man with horns of a bull and absolutely nowhere in historical record has the deity Moloch been depicted as an owl, as is reffered to as and spoken about in the Bohemian Grove conspiracy.This may be a small discrepancy in historical fact, but the implications leave big holes in the authors theories and unfortunately these misinterpretations of religious symbolism and historically erroneous claims repeat throughout the book.As someone who is interested in facts and finding truth about the world, I was a little disappointed with the authors conspiracy theories but I gave this two stars because the author was still able to present evidence to support his claims of pedophilic activity within the church, did a good job of collating the Information presented and provided sources for the information in the books bibliography.
Trustpilot
2 months ago
1 month ago