War Crimes Against Southern Civilians Hardcover – April 30, 2007

This should be required reading in every High School of this country. The truth about the War of Northern Aggression has been distorted so badly.........people actually think (indoctrinated) the war was fought to free the slaves and that the South was wrong. The book is full of references to back the claims (something Yankees can't do).

Walter Brian Cisco is lifelong scholar of American Civil War history, a professional writer, and researcher with many respected publications on the subject including States Rights Gist: A South Carolina General of the Civil War, Taking a Stand: Portraits from the Southern Secession Movement, Henry Timrod: A Biography, and Wade Hampton: Confederate Warrior, Conservative Statesman. In his latest book War Crimes Against Southern Civilians, Cisco writes on a subject that many historians have avoided, war crimes committed by the Union forces on the civilian population of the South beginning in the early years of the Civil War.In his book, Cisco does a commendable job of uncovering historical records from the time period in citing from sources that include accounts from enlisted Union soldiers that were involved in the events, official reports, letters, diaries, and various other testimonials from civilians that tell of the monstrosities committed against Southern population throughout the Civil War. Early in his book, Cisco clearly states Lincoln had adopted the "black flag" policy and this policy was executed by several Union commanders in dates far preceding the better known Sherman's March to the Sea. "Warring against noncombatants came to be the stated policy and deliberate practice in its subjugation of the Confederacy. Abraham Lincoln, the commander in chief with a reputation as a micromanager, well knew what was going on and approved" (pg. 16). Several pieces cited support this claim and are presented throughout the book.The evidence offered supporting the "black flag" policy adopted by the Lincoln administration is done in numerous ways. A few examples presented are incidents such as the 1861 St. Louis massacre in which twenty-eight civilians lay dead in the streets of St. Louis and seventy-five others were wounded by the hands of a force of between six and seven thousand Union regulars and German volunteers commanded by Capt. Nathanial Lyon (pg. 22 and 23). The 1862 occupation of New Orleans in which Maj. General Benjamin Butler, establishes martial law whose "decrees were worthy of a czar" and in one infamous order, commanding Union soldiers to treat the ladies of the town as prostitutes which could be "construed as a license for rape" (pg. 65). Other accounts are crimes committed against non-combatants were the attacks on Southern pacifist religious refugees, in which Sheridan's army robbed, plundered, poisoned wells with dead animal carcasses, and burned their houses to the ground during the Shenandoah Valley campaign of 1864 (pg. 124). Cisco cites several instances in which slaves and free blacks were robbed, raped, and killed by the hands of Union soldiers. Cisco's book is filled with damning evidence of the war crimes committed by the Union forces on the South. Any reader of this book has to question how a soldier in the U.S. military could justify the inhumane actions that were taken against a civilian population which included the elderly, women, children and slaves. The accounts of Union aggression stated seems surreal and brings forth a question of fallacy that has been planted in the minds of generations of Americans far from what the Union cause truly was about.War Crimes Against Southern Civilians chapters are organized by engagements recorded from 1861-1865 and follows the timeline very closely. The organization of the chapters is done in a manner that it is easy for a reader to follow and creates a clear account of how these events progressed throughout the war. The author also does a good job citing sources in the book and those that are used are accurate, but the format used in citing the information are not very user friendly. The pages within the text are void of footnotes and somewhat of a nuisance for readers who want quick access to citations presented on the page they are reading. Cisco does not include any footnotes in the book or endnotes at the end of each chapter, but instead lists all notes at the end of the book. Even though the book is well written, improvements could be made through the way notes are arranged and should do so if an updated version of the book is ever released.Without question, the author writes from a Southern perspective in presenting the atrocities Southern citizens were subjected to by Union forces. Many historians might discount Cisco's work for representing only the Southern viewpoint of the war in this book. However, through writing in a Southern viewpoint, Cisco has brought forth a piece of history that is unknown to many readers of Civil War history. The majority of books written about the Civil War give a very limited account of the events that took place with the intent of glorifying the actions of the Lincoln administration and the Union army. Cisco's contribution of the historical accounts of the Civil War is commendable and he meets a difficult subject matter head-on that other authors have purposely neglected. The facts Cisco presents, instills his readers with facts that contribute a more complete understanding of events that forever changed the course of a nation.After reading this book, an vital element in understanding the Civil War history is uncovered that many historians are not aware of. Cisco offers a wealth of evidence to his readers that have been too taboo for many academic writers to report. War Crimes Against Southern Civilians is a must read for historians who are truth seekers and want to attain a fuller understanding of the events that unfolded during a difficult time in American history.

A very interesting read and especially a good follow-up to reading The Real Lincoln by DiLorenzo. I think, at least in modern times, many residents of the old south have no idea that they live in a region that was destroyed militarily and occupied by an invading force. The standard "civil war" histories simply do not dive deep into the toll taken on the residents and civilians in the area. Read this book and learn why a small few in the South still harbor hatred for the Yankee invaders and in particular Sherman, Grant and Sheridan.Yankees will be repulsed by this volume... as they should be.

Great book with truth

Firstly, there are those who are still fighting or who want to re-fight the War of 1861-1865. I am not one of those people. We've enough to deal with in 2014. Nevertheless, it is unwise to ignore the documentation and stick our heads in the sand. It has been rightly said that those who win the wars write the history. Hence, we have a lopsided view of this era presented in our educational institutions. As historical evidence (which by the way has always been there right under our noses) is revealed and presented as testimony that not all is as has been reported, the truth comes more and more into focus, and -ah- things begin to make more sense.War Crimes Against Southern Civilians is a sad commentary on the truth of what really happened during the War Between the States. Sadly, because of the propaganda spoon fed to the masses since Reconstruction, very few would believe that their northern "heroes" would do such things. Heroes who would have taken a trip to the gallows had "Mr. Lincoln's War" been lost.While atrocities were obviously committed from both sides of the Mason Dixon, those perpetrated on Southern civilians where much more wide spread. Most importantly those crimes were actually sanctioned by the commanding officers all the way up to the White House. In contrast, Southern generals severely reprimanded and often executed southern soldiers who committed a fraction of what was allowed (and often encouraged) among the men dressed in blue. These are not things done in a corner. The book is well documented and is only a portion of the real story. There are other equally important works which expose the "heroes" of the north and paint the circumstances as they really were. From the north's blatant racism (Many of the northern states did not allow "free people of color" within their borders under threat of arrest) to the mistaken idea that the northern and southern lines were drawn between "free states" and "slave states" (At the outset of war several northern and border states were slave holding states, including Missouri, Kentucky, Delaware, Maryland, and even Washington DC.), misrepresentation of the truth (or rather, blatant lies) has been the historical revisionists, and propagandists weapons of warfare.I leave you with a question to ponder:Would there have been a Nuremberg had Germany won WW2?The truth needs to be told. Not many are "man enough" to accept it.

No comments needed

Interesting